> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.alterscope.org/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Alterscope vs Credora > How Alterscope differs from Credora's ratings and risk-oracle model. # Alterscope vs Credora | Platform | Category | Coverage | Risk analytics | Entity intelligence | Vault and oracle depth | Public API | Sources | | ---------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------ | | Alterscope | DeFi data infrastructure | 15+ protocol connectors across lending, perps, and DEX venues; the full indexed Morpho vault universe | Raw factors, scenarios, and agentic freshness | Entity and smart-money graph | Vault, oracle, curator, peg, and graph data | Yes | Alterscope API | | Credora | Ratings and risk oracle | Protocol, asset, and vault ratings | Standardized ratings and private expert analysis | Private workflow | Ratings rather than raw vault execution data | Request API access | `https://www.credora.network/` | Credora is ratings-led. Its public site positions Credora as a DeFi ratings protocol and risk oracle, with standardized methodologies, private expert analysis, onchain distribution, and request-based API access. Alterscope is data-led. It exposes the risk inputs: vault state, oracle history, peg behavior, curator events, graph signals, and freshness metadata. Teams can build their own ratings, screens, and agents on top of the data instead of consuming a rating as the final product. Use raw risk data when your model needs to own the final rating.