Skip to main content
When you allocate through curated vaults, you are really choosing a curator. This workflow compares curators on their actual on-chain history rather than their marketing.

​
The workflow

1

List and profile curators

GET /v2/curators enumerates the curators Alterscope tracks; GET /v2/curators/{addr} returns a single curator’s profile.
2

Read the track record

GET /v2/curators/{addr}/track-record summarizes how a curator has managed risk over time — the evidence base for trusting them with capital.
3

Compare economics and behavior

GET /v2/curators/{addr}/fee-history, …/allocations, and …/cap-timeline show what they charge, where they deploy, and how they’ve moved supply caps — so you can compare two curators on fees, concentration, and how conservatively they manage limits.

​
What you learn

An evidence-based ranking: which curator’s history, fee profile, and allocation discipline best fit your mandate — and which carry concentration or fee patterns you’d avoid. Pair this with pre-deposit due diligence on the specific vaults a curator runs. Every response carries freshness and quality metadata; full request/response detail is in the API reference.